Q) Your boss mentions that recently a number of employees have received calls from individuals who didn’t identify themselves and asked a lot of questions about the company and its computer infrastructure. At first, he thought this was just a computer vendor who was trying to sell your company some new product, but no vendor has approached the company. He also says several strange e-mails requesting personal information have been sent to employees, and quite a few people have been seen searching your company’s trash dumpsters for recyclable containers. Your boss asks what you think about all of these strange incidents. Respond and be sure to provide recommendations on what should be done about the various incidents.Instructions : 1) Refer chapters 1,2,3 from book attached and also from external papers.2) Original responses should not be a word for word rehashing of what is stated in the readings, but rather an integration of the concepts and additional insights, either from real world experience or additional sources. It should be a 500 word response to the question. FINALLY, you must cite your sources after every sentence which contains information from one of your sources. Just putting a citation at the end of a paragraph or section is not sufficient.
Unformatted Attachment Preview
chapter 1 Introduction and
Security is mostly a superstition. It does not exist in nature, nor do the children of men as a
whole experience it. Avoiding danger is no safer in the long run than outright exposure. Life is
either a daring adventure or nothing.
In this chapter, you will learn how to
Define computer security
Discuss common threats and recent computer crimes that have been committed
List and discuss recent trends in computer security
Describe common avenues of attacks
Describe approaches to computer security
Discuss the relevant ethical issues associated with computer security
hy should we be concerned about computer and network security?
All you have to do is turn on the television or read the newspaper to
find out about a variety of security problems that affect our nation
and the world today. The danger to computers and networks may seem to
pale in comparison to the threat of terrorist strikes, but in fact the average
citizen is much more likely to be the target of an attack on their own
personal computer, or a computer they use at their place of work, than they
are to be the direct victim of a terrorist attack. This chapter will introduce
you to a number of issues involved in securing your computers and
networks from a variety of threats that may utilize any of a number of
The Computer Security Problem
Fifty years ago companies did not conduct business across the Internet.
Online banking and shopping were only dreams in science fiction stories.
Today, however, millions of people perform online transactions every day.
Companies rely on the Internet to operate and conduct business. Vast
amounts of money are transferred via networks, in the form of either bank
transactions or simple credit card purchases. Wherever there are vast
amounts of money, there are those who will try to take advantage of the
environment to conduct fraud or theft. There are many different ways to
attack computers and networks to take advantage of what has made
shopping, banking, investment, and leisure pursuits a simple matter of
“dragging and clicking” (or tapping) for many people. Identity theft is so
common today that most everyone knows somebody who’s been a victim
of such a crime, if they haven’t been a victim themselves. This is just one
type of criminal activity that can be conducted using the Internet. There
are many others and all are on the rise.
Definition of Computer Security
Computer security is not a simple concept to define, and has numerous
complexities associated with it. If one is referring to a computer, then it
can be considered secure when the computer does what it is supposed to
do and only what it is supposed to do. But as was noted earlier, the
security emphasis has shifted from the computer to the information being
processed. Information security is defined by the information being
protected from unauthorized access or alteration and yet is available to
authorized individuals when required. When one begins considering the
aspects of information, it is important to realize that information is stored,
processed, and transferred between machines, and all of these different
states require appropriate protection schemes. Information assurance is a
term used to describe not just the protection of information, but a means of
knowing the level of protection that has been accomplished.
Historical Computer Security
Computer security is an ever-changing issue. Fifty years ago, computer security was mainly
concerned with the physical devices that made up the computer. At the time, computers were
the high-value items that organizations could not afford to lose. Today, computer equipment is
inexpensive compared to the value of the data processed by the computer. Now the high-value
item is not the machine, but the information that it stores and processes. This has
fundamentally changed the focus of computer security from what it was in the early years.
Today the data stored and processed by computers is almost always more valuable than the
Computer security and information security both refer to a state where the hardware and software
perform only desired actions and the information is protected from unauthorized access or
alteration and is available to authorized users when required.
Historical Security Incidents
By examining some of the computer-related crimes that have been
committed over the last 30 or so years, we can better understand the threats
and security issues that surround our computer systems and networks.
Electronic crime can take a number of different forms, but the ones we will
examine here fall into two basic categories: crimes in which the computer
was the target, and incidents in which a computer was used to perpetrate
the act (for example, there are many different ways to conduct bank fraud,
one of which uses computers to access the records that banks process and
We will start our tour of computer crimes with the 1988 Internet worm
(Morris worm), one of the first real Internet crime cases. Prior to 1988,
criminal activity was chiefly centered on unauthorized access to computer
systems and networks owned by the telephone company and companies
that provided dial-up access for authorized users. Virus activity also
existed prior to 1988, having started in the early 1980s.
The Morris Worm (November 1988)
Robert Morris, then a graduate student at Cornell University, released what
has become known as the Internet worm (or the Morris worm). The worm
infected roughly 10 percent of the machines then connected to the Internet
(which amounted to approximately 6000 infected machines). The worm
carried no malicious payload, the program being obviously a “work in
progress,” but it did wreak havoc because it continually re-infected
computer systems until they could no longer run any programs.
Citibank and Vladimir Levin (June–October 1994)
Starting about June of 1994 and continuing until at least October of the
same year, a number of bank transfers were made by Vladimir Levin of St.
Petersburg, Russia. By the time he and his accomplices were caught, they
had transferred an estimated $10 million. Eventually all but about
$400,000 was recovered. Levin reportedly accomplished the break-ins by
dialing into Citibank’s cash management system. This system allowed
clients to initiate their own fund transfers to other banks.
Kevin Mitnick (February 1995)
Kevin Mitnick’s computer activities occurred over a number of years
during the 1980s and 1990s. Arrested in 1995, he eventually pled guilty to
four counts of wire fraud, two counts of computer fraud, and one count of
illegally intercepting a wire communication and was sentenced to 46
months in jail. In the plea agreement, Mitnick admitted to having gained
unauthorized access to a number of different computer systems belonging
to companies such as Motorola, Novell, Fujitsu, and Sun Microsystems.
He described using a number of different “tools” and techniques, including
social engineering, sniffers, and cloned cellular telephones.
In the early days of computer crime, much of the criminal activity centered on gaining
unauthorized access to computer systems. In many early cases, the perpetrator of the crime
did not intend to cause any damage to the computer but was instead on a quest of
“intellectual curiosity”—trying to learn more about computers and networks. Today the
ubiquitous nature of computers and networks has eliminated the perceived need for
individuals to break into computers to learn more about them. While there are still those who
dabble in hacking for the intellectual challenge, it is more common today for the intellectual
curiosity to be replaced by malicious intent. Whatever the reason, today it is considered
unacceptable (and illegal) to gain unauthorized access to computer systems and networks.
Omega Engineering and Timothy Lloyd (July 1996)
On July 30, 1996, a software “time bomb” went off at Omega Engineering,
a New Jersey–based manufacturer of high-tech measurement and control
instruments. Twenty days earlier, Timothy Lloyd, a computer network
program designer, had been dismissed from the company after a period of
growing tension between Lloyd and management at Omega. The program
that ran on July 30 deleted all of the design and production programs for
the company, severely damaging the small firm and forcing the layoff of
80 employees. The program was eventually traced back to Lloyd, who had
left it in retaliation for his dismissal.
Worcester Airport and “Jester” (March 1997)
In March of 1997, telephone services to the FAA control tower as well as
the emergency services at the Worcester Airport and the community of
Rutland, Massachusetts, were cut off for a period of six hours. This
disruption occurred as a result of an attack on the phone network by a
teenage computer “hacker” who went by the name “Jester.”
The Melissa Virus (March 1999)
Melissa is the best known of the early macro-type viruses that attach
themselves to documents for programs that have limited macro
programming capability. The virus, written and released by David Smith,
infected about a million computers and caused an estimated $80 million in
Speed of Virus Proliferation
The speed at which the Slammer worm spread served as a wakeup call to security
professionals. It drove home the point that the Internet could be adversely impacted in a
matter of minutes. This in turn caused a number of professionals to rethink how prepared they
needed to be in order to respond to virus outbreaks in the future. A good first step is to apply
patches to systems and software as soon as possible. This will often eliminate the
vulnerabilities that the worms and viruses are designed to target.
The Love Letter Virus (May 2000)
Also known as the “ILOVEYOU” worm and the “Love Bug,” the Love
Letter virus was written and released by a Philippine student named Onel
de Guzman. The virus was spread via e-mail with the subject line of
“ILOVEYOU.” Estimates of the number of infected machines worldwide
have been as high as 45 million, accompanied by a possible $10 billion in
damages (it should be noted that figures like these are extremely hard to
verify or calculate).
The Code Red Worm (2001)
On July 19, 2001, in a period of 14 hours, over 350,000 computers
connected to the Internet were infected by the Code Red worm. The cost
estimate for how much damage the worm caused (including variations of
the worm released on later dates) exceeded $2.5 billion. The vulnerability
was a buffer-overflow condition in Microsoft’s IIS web servers, had been
known for a month.
The Slammer Worm (2003)
On Saturday, January 25, 2003, the Slammer worm was released. It
exploited a buffer-overflow vulnerability in computers running Microsoft
SQL Server or SQL Server Desktop Engine. Like the vulnerability in Code
Red, this weakness was not new and, in fact, had been discovered and a
patch released in July of 2002. Within the first 24 hours of Slammer’s
release, the worm had infected at least 120,000 hosts and caused network
outages and the disruption of airline flights, elections, and ATMs. At its
peak, Slammer-infected hosts were generating a reported 1TB of wormrelated traffic every second. The worm doubled its number of infected
hosts every 8 seconds. It is estimated that it took less than 10 minutes to
reach global proportions and infect 90 percent of the possible hosts it could
Website Defacements (2006)
In May of 2006, a Turkish hacker using the handle iSKORPiTX
successfully hacked over 21,000 websites in a single effort. The rationale
for his actions was never determined, and over the next few years he
hacked hundreds of thousands of websites, defacing their cover page with
a statement of his hack. A nuisance to some, those affected had to clean up
their systems, including repairing vulnerabilities, or he would strike again.
In May of 2007, the country of Estonia was crippled by a massive denialof-service (DoS) cyberattack against all of its infrastructure, firms (banks),
and government offices. This attack was traced to IP addresses in Russia,
but was never clearly attributed to a government-sanctioned effort.
Operation Bot Roast (2007)
In 2007, the FBI announced that it had conducted Operation Bot Roast,
identifying over 1 million botnet crime victims. In the process of
dismantling the botnets, the FBI arrested several botnet operators across
the United States. Although seemingly a big success, this effort made only
a small dent in the vast volume of botnets in operation.
In late 2008 and early 2009, security experts became alarmed when it was
discovered that millions of systems attached to the Internet were infected
with the Downadup worm. Also known as Conficker, the worm was
believed to have originated in Ukraine. Infected systems were not initially
damaged beyond having their antivirus solution updates blocked. What
alarmed experts was the fact that infected systems could be used in a
secondary attack on other systems or networks. Each of these infected
systems was part of what is known as a bot network (or botnet) and could
be used to cause a DoS attack on a target or be used for the forwarding of
spam e-mail to millions of users.
U.S. Electric Power Grid (2009)
In April 2009, Homeland Security Secretary Janet Napolitano told
reporters that the United States was aware of attempts by both Russia and
China to break into the U.S. electric power grid, map it out, and plant
destructive programs that could be activated at a later date. She indicated
that these attacks were not new and had in fact been going on for years.
One article in the Kansas City Star, for example, reported that in 1997 the
local power company, Kansas City Power and Light, encountered perhaps
10,000 attacks for the entire year. By 2009 the company experienced 30–
60 million attacks.
One of the most effective measures security professionals can take to address attacks on their
computer systems and networks is to ensure that all software is up to date in terms of vendorreleased patches. Many of the outbreaks of viruses and worms would have been much less
severe if everybody had applied security updates and patches when they were released. For the
operating system that you use, go to your favorite web browser to find what patches exist for the
operating system and what vulnerabilities or issues the patches were created to address.
Fiber Cable Cut (2009)
On April 9, 2009, a widespread phone and Internet outage hit the San Jose
area in California. This outage was not the result of a group of determined
hackers gaining unauthorized access to the computers that operate these
networks, but instead occurred as a result of several intentional cuts in the
physical cables that carry the signals. The cuts resulted in a loss of all
telephone, cell phone, and Internet service for thousands of users in the
San Jose area. Emergency services such as 911 were also affected, which
could have had severe consequences.
The Current Threat Environment
The threats of the past were smaller, targeted, and in many cases only a
nuisance. As time has gone on, more organized elements of cybercrime
have entered the picture along with nation-states. From 2009 and beyond,
the cyberthreat landscape became considerably more dangerous, with new
adversaries out to perform one of two functions: deny you the use of your
computer systems, or use your systems for financial gain including theft of
intellectual property or financial information including personally
Advanced Persistent Threats
Although there are numerous claims as to when advanced persistent
threats (APTs) began and who first coined the term, the important issue is
to note that APTs represent a new breed of attack pattern. Although
specific definitions vary, the three words that comprise the term provide
the key elements: advanced, persistent, and threat. Advanced refers to the
use of advanced techniques, such as spear phishing, as a vector into a
target. Persistent refers to the attacker’s goal of establishing a long-term,
hidden position on a system. Many APTs can go on for years without
being noticed. Threat refers to the other objective: exploitation. If an
adversary invests the resources to achieve an APT attack, they are doing it
for some form of long-term advantage. APTs are not a specific type of
attack, but rather the new means by which highly resourced adversaries
In 2009, the Dalai Lama’s office contacted security experts to determine if
it was being bugged. The investigation revealed it was, and the spy ring
that was discovered was eventually shown to be spying on over 100
countries’ sensitive missions worldwide. Researchers gave this APT-style
spy network the name GhostNet, and although the effort was traced back
to China, full attribution was never determined.
Operation Aurora (2009)
Operation Aurora was an APT attack first reported by Google, but also
targeting Adobe, Yahoo, Juniper Networks, Rackspace, Symantec, and
several major U.S. financial and industrial firms. Research analysis
pointed to the People’s Liberation Army (PLA) of China as the sponsor.
The attack ran for most of 2009 and operated on a large scale, with the
groups behind the attack consisting of hundreds of hackers working
together against the victim firms.
Stuxnet, Duqu, and Flame (2009–2012)
Stuxnet, Duqu, and Flame represent examples of state-sponsored malware.
Stuxnet was a malicious worm designed to infiltrate the Iranian uranium
enrichment program, to modify the equipment and cause the systems to
fail in order to achieve desired results and in some cases even destroy the
equipment. Stuxnet was designed to attack a specific model of Siemens
programmable logic controller (PLC), which was one of the clues pointing
to its objective, the modification of the uranium centrifuges. Although
neither the United States nor Israel has admitted to participating in the
attack, both have been suggested to have had a role in it.
Duqu (2011) is a piece of malware that appears to be a follow-on of
Stuxnet, and has many of the same targets, but rather than being
destructive in nature, Duqu is designed to steal information. The malware
uses command and control servers across the globe to collect elements
such as keystrokes and system information from machines and deliver
them to unknown parties.
Flame (2012) is another piece of modular malware that may be a
derivative of Stuxnet. Flame is an information collection threat, collecting
keystrokes, screenshots, and network traffic. It can record Skype calls and
audio signals on a machine. Flame is a large piece of malware with many
specific modules, including a kill switch and a means of evading antivirus
Because of the open nature of Stuxnet—its source code is widely
available on the Internet—it is impossible to know who is behind Duqu
and Flame. In fact, although Duqu and Flame were discovered after
Stuxnet, there is growing evidence that they were present before Stuxnet
and collected critical intelligence needed to conduct the later attack. The
real story behind these malware items is that they demonstrate the power
and capability of nation-state malware.
The hacker group LulzSec reportedly hacked Sony, stealing over 70
million user accounts. The resulting outage lasted 23 days, and cost Sony
in excess of $170 million. One of the biggest issues related to the attack
was Sony’s poor response, taking more than a week to notify people of the
initial attack, and then communicating poorly with its user base during the
recovery period. Also notable was that although the credit card data was
encrypted on Sony’s …
Purchase answer to see full